The pre-work your meetings are missing


The Decision Navigator

A weekly guide for leaders who want to navigate decisions better in an age of noise, pressure, and AI.

Someone in your organization knows what to do.

You've made sure of it. You built a smart team. You brought them into the process. You asked for input — and what you got was a room full of opinions you had no idea what to do with.

And here's what makes it worse: you haven't just stalled the decision. You've slowed everything down, surfaced competing agendas, and created the illusion of alignment without any of the substance. Your team thinks they've been heard. You're not sure what you heard. And the decision is no closer than when you started.

Smart people. Good intentions. Still stuck.


Anchor First

Early in my career I worked with pharma and biotech companies preparing to launch their first major product. Coming out of graduate studies in decision analysis, I assumed the pipeline decisions would be the most complex — calculating likelihood of success, projected revenue, cost to continue. But those were mostly math problems. Complicated, yes. But solvable.

The decision that would stop everything cold was downstream. How do you commercialize the product?

Build a full commercial organization from scratch — sales, marketing, analytics, service — that doesn't exist yet. Rent one from a service provider at a higher cost but keep the revenues and test the waters before going all in. Or license and partner, lowering your expense but giving up the most upside.

As a consultant I would pour through the market analysis. Model the scenarios. Speak to potential partners. Boil it all down into three clean options with criteria, tradeoffs, and a recommendation.

And 100% of the time I'd be sent back to redo some part of the analysis.

100% of the time.

It took me longer than I'd like to admit to figure out what was actually happening. We weren't stuck on the analysis. We were stuck because we had never set the Anchor.

Nobody had answered the questions that made the analysis meaningful. Do we envision building a fully grown commercial organization — or do we like being a nimble biotech startup? What are our actual financial constraints? What's the most we can realistically go back to the board for? What does success look like in five years — and is that the same answer for everyone in this room?

Without those answers, the analysis wasn't clarifying anything. It was just giving people more sophisticated things to disagree about.

When we started doing that foundational work first — defining the vision, naming the constraints, establishing the non-negotiables before anyone touched the options — the downstream decisions moved faster and landed better. Not because the options changed. Because the room finally had a shared frame to evaluate them against.

That's the pre-work. And almost no one does it.


Do the Pre-Work

This isn't a pharma industry problem. It's a people problem. And it's happening in your organization every week.

64% of professionals report their meetings are ineffective. That number gets quoted a lot. What doesn't get discussed is why.

It's not because your people are disengaged. It's not because you're holding too many meetings — though you probably are. It's because you're asking people to decide before you've done the work to frame what you're actually deciding.

You walk into the room with a question. Your team walks in with assumptions — about what matters, what's off the table, what success looks like, what the real constraints are. Nobody's assumptions match. So what looks like a decision meeting is actually a negotiation between competing mental models that nobody has made explicit.

You get opinions. You get debate. You get the appearance of progress.

You don't get a decision.

The pre-work isn't complicated. But it has to happen before the room fills up. What are we actually here to decide? What are the non-negotiables? What constraints are real versus assumed? What does success look like — and does everyone in this room agree on that?

That's the Anchor. And it's the phase most leaders skip entirely — not because they're lazy, but because nobody ever showed them it existed.


👥 If you lead a team:

Before your next decision meeting, do the pre-work. Write down the three things that are non-negotiable. Write down what success looks like in concrete terms. Then ask yourself honestly — does everyone in that room have the same answers? If you don't know, find out before you open the floor.

If you’re running solo:

You're not immune to this. The decisions that stall you — the ones you keep circling back to — usually aren't analysis problems either. They're Anchor problems. You haven't defined the constraint, named the vision, or identified the non-negotiable. Do that first. The path forward gets clearer faster than you'd expect.

✝️ If you’re navigating this with faith:

You have more agency than you're using — and a responsibility to steward it well. Before you bring others into a decision, do the work of knowing what you actually believe about it. What are your values telling you? What's the non-negotiable that God has already made clear? Anchor there first. Then open the conversation.

Decisive Leadership

This week's deep dive is for team leaders. Faith-driven decision-makers — your turn next week.

There are really only three types of meetings.

Information sharing. Someone has something the room needs to know. These are almost always ineffective as meetings — because meetings are a terrible way to share information. A well-written document, a short video, a Slack update does it better, faster, and lets people process on their own time. If your meeting is primarily this, cancel it and send the document.

Team building. Connection, trust, culture. These matter enormously — and we almost never do them as standalone meetings. We try to shoe-horn them into the first ten minutes of something else and wonder why culture feels thin.

Decision-making. This is where the work happens. And this is where almost everyone skips the basics.

A decision meeting done right looks like this: a clear agenda sent in advance that names the actual decision — not the topic, the decision. Pre-work distributed so people arrive informed, not forming opinions in real time. The right people in the room — meaning the people who own the outcome, not everyone who has a perspective on it.

And before anyone speaks: ground rules. Here is what we are here to decide. Here are the guiding principles. Here are the non-negotiables. Here is what is off the table.

Without that framing, you don’t have a decision meeting. You have an opinions meeting. And opinions without structure are just noise with confidence behind it.

Here’s what nobody tells you about the “bring the team along” approach when it goes wrong.

Your team doesn’t just feel frustrated. They feel unheard — even though you asked for their input. Because input without structure disappears. Opinions without a framework don’t become decisions. They become noise that leaders quietly set aside, and everyone in the room knows it.

Over time, smart people stop bringing their best thinking. Not because they don’t care. Because they’ve learned it doesn’t actually change anything.

A well-run decision meeting does the opposite. It makes the input visible and tangible — people can see where their thinking landed in the framework, how it shaped the criteria, what it ruled out. They may not always get the outcome they wanted. But they trust that the process was real and that you led it with integrity.

That’s what decisive leadership actually looks like. Not a leader who decides alone. A leader who frames well, listens structurally, and makes the call with clarity.

Your team wants to be heard. They need you to lead. A well-designed decision meeting is how you do both at the same time.


This isn't just about better meetings. It's about reclaiming your credibility as a leader — and giving your team a reason to bring their best thinking every time you ask for it.

Decisive organizations aren't built on talent alone. They're built on leaders who do the pre-work, frame the decision, and create the conditions for clarity. That's what unlocks momentum. That's what makes the difference between a team that executes and one that endlessly deliberates.

Decision-making is the skill that changes everything else.

If you want a one-page structure to run this process start to finish, the Decision Canvas is built for exactly that. Grab it free below.

This Week's Action Step

Before your next team decision meeting, write down three things: the actual decision you're there to make — not the topic, the decision. The non-negotiables that are off the table. And what success looks like in concrete terms.

Send those to the room before you meet. See what changes.


📨 Know a leader ready to be both decisive and empowering?

Forward this their way.

That's it for this week. May this week’s decisions find you anchored, wise, and courageously decisive.

Andy


1445 Woodmont Lane NW #713, Atlanta, GA 30318
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Are you a business leader reader to start implementing a change like this in your organization? Let's have a chat.

Want to go deeper? Explore the archive →