I've been building an AI decision tool for months


The Decision Navigator

A weekly guide for leaders who want to navigate decisions better in an age of noise, pressure, and AI.

You’ve done this.

You built the spreadsheet. Listed the criteria. Rated the vendors. Ran the weighted average.

And then — when the math pointed somewhere your gut didn’t — you quietly adjusted the scores.

Not to cheat. Not to be sloppy. Because you knew something the spreadsheet didn’t. And you had no other way to say it.

That moment — right there — is the most important thing I want to talk to you about this week.


Smart. Wise. Discerning.

Here’s what was actually happening in that spreadsheet moment.

You were being smart. You gathered the data, weighted the criteria, ran the math. That’s not nothing — most people skip even that. Smart decisions have a process. They’re defensible. They survive the meeting.

But smart has a ceiling.

The wise leader knows when the output isn’t the whole truth. Something nags. You pause before sending the recommendation. You don’t blindly follow the model. You know the numbers captured most of it — but not all of it. That pause is wisdom. It’s knowing the map isn’t the territory.

The problem is what most of us do next.

We don’t trust the pause. We can’t verbalize what it’s telling us. So instead of owning it, we smuggle it back into the process — adjust a score here, reweight a criterion there — until the spreadsheet agrees with what we already sensed.

We had a discerning instinct. Our tacit knowledge pointed to something. And we laundered it through the data because we didn’t have a better way to say it.

That’s the gap discernment fills.

Discernment isn’t a feeling. It isn’t instinct. It’s the ability to name what the data points at but won’t say out loud. To find the truth even when you can’t fully verbalize it. To cut through when smart and wise have both run out of road.

Smart asks: do the numbers add up? Wise asks: does something feel off? Discerning asks: what is actually true here — and can I lead with it?

The best decisions I’ve been part of had all three. Most decision processes only build the first.


Building it.

I've spent the last several months trying to build a tool that gets past smart.

Getting AI to be smart about decisions? Solved. Weighted criteria, probability assessments, structured evaluation — it handles that better than most analysts and faster than any committee.

Getting it to be wise? Making progress. The harder problem wasn't the logic — it was the behavior. A wise tool knows when to slow you down. It knows you'll want to race ahead and treat filling out the form as the goal. It intervenes. It asks the question you were about to skip. That's not a smarter algorithm. That's the tool accounting for how humans actually decide.

Getting it to discern?

That's where it keeps breaking down.

I can teach it the right order. I can teach it to spot the most common biases. I can get it to be wise most of the time. But with enough back and forth it drifts. It forgets its principles. It over-corrects for the last thing you said. It starts telling you what you want to hear.

I wouldn't be much of a coach if I did that after a long session. The tool shouldn't either.

I'm not there yet. But I'm closer than I was. And I think the people who help me break it will get there with me.


Want Alpha access to the Decision Navigator app?

For the last several months I’ve been building a Decision Navigator — an AI-powered decision support agent that does what I do when I coach. Asks the right questions. In the right order. At the right pace.

I’m not ready to launch it. But I’m ready to let a few people break it.

If you want Alpha access — reply to this email with one word: In.

I’ll be in touch.

👥 If you lead a team:

The next time your team is stuck on a decision, try this before you add more data to the pile. Give your smartest people explicit permission to say what they believe without reconciling it with the numbers. No hedging, no qualifying. Just what they actually think is true. You'll find the root of the delay — and your path to alignment — faster than any spreadsheet will get you there.

If you’re running solo:

You don't have the luxury of analyzing every decision. But you do have the ability to notice them. For your medium-sized decisions — the ones that nag but don't stop you — get in the habit of a quick capture. What are you deciding and why. Schedule a review for 30 days out. You'll be surprised what you learn about your own discernment when you start treating your decisions like experiments rather than verdicts.

✝️ If you’re navigating this with faith:

Stop switching between wise mode and smart mode depending on how anxious you are. That's not discernment — that's coping. Discernment lives in the discomfort, not around it. The cutting-through isn't comfortable. Stay there longer than feels reasonable. That's usually where the truth is.

This week's action step:

Pick a decision you made in the last 90 days. A real one — hiring, strategy, a vendor, a pivot.

Fill out the Decision Canvas retrospectively. As completely as you can. What were the real criteria? What were the constraints you treated as criteria? What options did you actually consider?

Then ask yourself one honest question: How accurately does this describe what I actually thought and felt when we made the decision?

Feel the gap. Label it.

Was it bias — did the process get manipulated to match the answer you already wanted?

Or was it discernment — did you know something true that the process couldn’t hold?

You can’t learn to trust your discernment if you can’t distinguish it from your bias. Documenting your decisions is how you start to tell the difference.

👇 Download the Decision Canvas free


Want Alpha access to the Decision Navigator app?

If your team is running vendor evaluations, hiring decisions, or strategic prioritization — and you suspect the real answer lives somewhere the spreadsheet isn't capturing — Alpha access to the Decision Navigator app is for you.

Reply to this email with one word: In.

Smart is a button click away. Wisdom takes experience. Discernment takes courage.

That's what we're building toward — together.

To courageous decisions,

Andy


1445 Woodmont Lane NW #713, Atlanta, GA 30318
Unsubscribe · Preferences

P.S. — Know someone this would resonate with? Please forward it to them. Personal recommendations are the best way for me to impact more people tired of the status quo but need frameworks to get out.